"The interface theory of perception contends that there is a screen--an interface--between us and objective reality. Can we hope to pierce that screen and see objective reality? Conscious realism says yes: we have met reality and it is like us. We are conscious agents, and so is objective reality. Beyond the interface lurks no Kantian noumenon, forever alien and impervious to our inquiry. Instead, we find agents like us: conscious agents. Their variety dwarfs the dazzling diversity of creatures that have paraded the earth and bequeathed to its sediments innumerable petrified mementos of their sojourn. We cannot imagine, concretely, even one new color. We cannot hope to imagine but a fraction of the varied experiences enjoyed by this multifarious host of agents. But despite our diversity, we share a unity: we are all agents, conscious agents." (p. 191)
From Donald Hoffman's "The Case Against Reality: Why Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes
The upshot of Hoffman's ITP in this realization is just how much it 'jives' with Michael Levin's work on xenobots and similar statements concerning consciousness being a fundamental unit of what we see. Likewise, Wolfram's automata and the ruliad guiding their interactions also finds complexity in simple units operating on simple rule sets. And most importantly, his notion is that even these simple structures can be perceived by us as complex because we are merely as complex as them. We can't rule them by constructing a rule that will determine their outcome many discreet moves into the future. We get the same outcome, everything is looking back at us. What we see in the complexity of the world around us is the work of consciousness--ours to see it, and theirs to be seen as such.